Next: RI-MP2-F12 Calculations
Up: General Comments on MP2
Previous: Fast RI-MP2 calculations with
Contents
Index
- Most important output for ricc2, rimp2, and mpgrad are of course
MP2(+HF) energies (written standard output and additionally to file
energy) and MP2(+HF) gradients (written to file
gradient).
- In case of MP2 gradient calculations the modules also calculate
the MP2 dipole moment from the MP2 density matrix (note, that in
case of mpgrad frozen core orbital specification is ignored for
gradient calculations and thus for MP2 dipole moments).
Further output contains indications of the suitability of the (HF+MP2)
treatment.
- As discussed above, reliable (HF+MP2) results are in line with
small MP2 corrections. The size of the MP2 correction is
characterised by the t-amplitudes, as evident from the above
equations. mpgrad by default plots the five largest t-amplitudes
as well as the five largest norms of t-amplitudes for fixed i and
j, rimp2 does the same upon request, if $tplot is added
to control file. More or less than five t-amplitudes will
be plotted for $tplot n, where n denotes the
number of largest amplitudes to be plotted. It is up to the user to
decide from these quantities, whether the (SCF+MP2) treatment is
suited for the present problem or not. Unfortunately, it is not
possible to define a threshold, which distinguishes a "good" and a
"bad" MP2-case, since the value of individual t-amplitudes are not
orbital-invariant, but depend on the orbital basis (and thereby
under certain circumstances even on the orientation).
Example: the largest norm
of t-amplitudes for the Cu-atom (
d10s1, "good" MP2-case)
amounts to ca. 0.06, that of the Ni-atom (d8s2, "bad" MP2
case) is ca. 0.14.
- A more descriptive criterion may be derived from the MP2 density
matrix. The eigenvalues of this matrix reflect the changes in
occupation numbers resulting from the MP2 treatment, compared to the
SCF density matrix, where occupation numbers are either one (two for
RHF) or zero. Small changes mean small corrections to HF and thus
suitability of the (HF+MP2) method for the given problem. In case of
gradient calculations rimp2 displays by default the largest
eigenvalue of the MP2 density matrix, i.e. the largest change in
occupation numbers (in %). All eigenvalues are shown, if
$mp2occ is added to the control file. For main
group compounds largest changes in occupation numbers of ca. 5% or
less are typical, for d10 metal compounds somewhat higher
values are tolerable.
- A similar idea is pursued by the D2 and D1 diagnostics
[86,87] which is implemented in ricc2.
D2 is a diagnostic for strong interactions of the HF reference state
with doubly excited determinants, while D1 is a diagnostic
for strong interactions with singly excited determinants.
Next: RI-MP2-F12 Calculations
Up: General Comments on MP2
Previous: Fast RI-MP2 calculations with
Contents
Index
TURBOMOLE